Manage cookies
This site uses cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, and help us understand your interests and enhance the site. Visit our cookie policy to learn more.
Manage cookies
Cookie Settings
Cookies necessary for the correct operation of the site are always enabled.
Other cookies are configurable.
Essential cookies
Always On. These cookies are essential so that you can use the website and use its functions. They cannot be turned off. They're set in response to requests made by you, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms.
Analytics cookies
Disabled
These cookies collect information to help us understand how our Websites are being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customise our Websites for you. See a list of the analytics cookies we use here.
Advertising cookies
Disabled
These cookies provide advertising companies with information about your online activity to help them deliver more relevant online advertising to you or to limit how many times you see an ad. This information may be shared with other advertising companies. See a list of the advertising cookies we use here.
Data Centre Resilience Case Study | Resilience Guard
Home  ›  Insights  ›  Case studies  ›  Technology and telecoms
Case study · Technology and telecoms

Uptime resilience and cyber physical continuity for a global data centre operator

Near zero downtime tolerance: uptime assurance, cyber physical readiness and auditable continuity for critical digital infrastructure.

Practitioner led since 2014 Led by John Zeppos, Founder and Group Managing Director DRI Accredited training provider Three BCI Global Awards 16+ EU Horizon research projects Trusted to train 3 of the Big Four
SectorData centres and cloud infrastructure
FootprintFacilities across Europe and beyond
FrameworksISO 22301, NIS2 and DORA context
FocusUptime assurance

Business context: data centre continuity is economic continuity

Downtime tolerance in data centres is near zero, and regulated clients demand measurable assurance:

  • Cyber enabled disruption affecting critical service availability.
  • Physical incidents impacting facility operations.
  • Utility dependency: power, cooling and connectivity.
  • Supplier failure risk across hyperscale infrastructure ecosystems.
  • Assurance demands from regulated clients under DORA related expectations and NIS2 scrutiny of critical digital infrastructure.
How can infrastructure availability and continuity governance be strengthened across facilities, ensuring auditable uptime resilience for critical client ecosystems?

The situation

The operator maintained multiple facilities with varying maturity and fragmented uptime governance:

  • Inconsistent recovery objectives between regions.
  • Limited integration between cyber incident response and infrastructure continuity.
  • Supplier dependency risk not formally embedded into resilience strategy.
  • No unified crisis escalation structure for hyperscale disruption events.
  • Rising audit pressure from regulated sector clients demanding continuity evidence.

How the engagement was built

Engagement architecture: Uptime resilience and cyber physical continuity for a global data centre operatorExecutive assurance and crisis governance01Uptime criticalservice definition02Cyber physicaldisruption readiness03Supplier and utilitycontinuity assurance04Client gradeevidence and crisisescalationISO 22301 aligned business impact analysis and evidence base
The engagement architecture: governance above, sector-specific pillars, an ISO 22301 evidence base beneath.

01Uptime critical service definition

Facility and service level definition of what uptime protection actually requires, with recovery objectives grounded in client obligations rather than generic tiers.

02Cyber physical disruption readiness

Integrated response for scenarios where cyber and physical dimensions interact: ransomware against management environments, utility loss requiring controlled recovery.

03Supplier and utility continuity assurance

Dependency mapping and continuity strategies across power, cooling, connectivity and hyperscale supplier ecosystems.

04Client grade evidence and crisis escalation

Audit ready continuity evidence and one crisis escalation model for outage events, meeting the assurance bar of regulated clients.

What programmes of this maturity deliver

Consistent with the firm's experience across the sector, high maturity programmes of this kind typically achieve:

Typical outcome ranges of high maturity programmes0%50%100%Faster infrastructure recovery30 to 50%
Typical ranges across comparable high maturity programmes, not a single client claim.
  • Stronger crisis escalation coordination for outage events.
  • Improved supplier and utility dependency resilience.
  • Enhanced audit confidence for regulated client ecosystems.
Frequently asked questions: Data centre continuity
How does ISO 22301 apply to data centre operators?

It ensures uptime critical services, recovery objectives and infrastructure continuity governance are measurable, auditable and aligned with client assurance requirements.

Why is cyber physical resilience essential in digital infrastructure?

Data centre disruption is rarely purely cyber or purely physical. Effective resilience integrates both, ensuring coordinated recovery of facility operations, management systems and infrastructure stability.

What evidence do regulated clients expect from providers?

Defined recovery objectives, tested continuity arrangements, supplier dependency oversight and exercise records with closed actions, in a form their own auditors and regulators will accept.

Related
Start the conversation

Put this capability behind your operations.

A confidential conversation with a senior practitioner who has delivered in your sector. We respond within 24 hours.

Book a consultation
All consultations are treated with strict confidentiality.