Manage cookies
This site uses cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, and help us understand your interests and enhance the site. Visit our cookie policy to learn more.
Manage cookies
Cookie Settings
Cookies necessary for the correct operation of the site are always enabled.
Other cookies are configurable.
Essential cookies
Always On. These cookies are essential so that you can use the website and use its functions. They cannot be turned off. They're set in response to requests made by you, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms.
Analytics cookies
Disabled
These cookies collect information to help us understand how our Websites are being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customise our Websites for you. See a list of the analytics cookies we use here.
Advertising cookies
Disabled
These cookies provide advertising companies with information about your online activity to help them deliver more relevant online advertising to you or to limit how many times you see an ad. This information may be shared with other advertising companies. See a list of the advertising cookies we use here.
How the Misuse of Language Harms the Soul: Ethics, Power and Communication | Resilience Guard Blog
Home  ›  Insights  ›  Blog  ›  Profession
Profession

How the Misuse of Language Harms the Soul: Ethics, Power and Communication

A reflection on language, ethics and leadership: why precision in what we say is a professional duty, not a stylistic preference.

How the Misuse of Language Harms the Soul: Ethics, Power and Communication
Published 20 September 2020 · Resilience Guard GmbH · Profession
As business people talk the relevant language and is a common belief that every single word is always perceived and interpreted the way it was meant to be, we are often led to miscommunication and misunderstanding that does not really help the business itself.
Besides that, the business jargon is quite different from one office to another, same for sectors, cultures etc.
But have you ever wondered, what really happens when people are trying to emphasise on their communications by using words that tend to be obviously inappropriate, just to make sure that they have others’ attention?
How many times have you been the recipients of one’s call for support, while they are claiming that they have an “emergency situation”?
How about the case that one claims to be in the middle of a “crisis”?
Why do some people tend to use “extra urgent” when they refer to something they are in desperate need of your full attention? Isn’s just “urgent” enough ?
In many cases, we find out that the whole thing was nothing even close to an emergency, crisis or extra urgent situation, so we might then categorise the messenger as “The boy who cried wolf”, meaning in fact that they are never getting our attention again in any future case – even if the situation is real.
Now, try to figure out what happens when your manager calls you, claiming that there is an ongoing crisis in their office, just because their dustbin caught – accidentally or not – fire?
Most probably you will think that they are exaggerating for nothing, so they aren’t getting your attention next time. Check.
If you flip that picture upside down and imagine what will happen to your credibility if you wake up and upset your manager or – even worse – your CEO, to tell them that something is extra urgent to be communicated to them, because you are facing a crisis that you need to report, just to let them find out a bit later that the photocopier was out of paper, you’ll have them thinking twice about what urged them to promote you. You do not want that. Ever.
It is important to always add the appropriate level of emphasis when communicating a real incident that might impact the business, or some individual(s) as well, but it is also important to not amplify the real facts, but instead pass the message exactly as is.
People that have a role during a disruptive incident, are usually well trained and most of the times well-rehearsed, but do not expect that to be the case with just anyone. In many cases, people are afraid of uncertainty and panic easily, so they can be difficult to control during an evacuation or in other cases that require attention by the Business Continuity, Risk, Security, Resilience team, in order for the incident to be properly contained and return to normal operations as soon as practical.
Remember that one is always a link within an extensive response mechanism chain, so it’s up to you to choose whether you prove to be the weakest link, or not.
Related reading
Start the conversation

Turn analysis into capability.

The practitioners who write these pieces also deliver the work. A confidential conversation, answered within 24 hours.

Book a consultation
All consultations are treated with strict confidentiality.